Major global vendors of heavy ERP systems have exited Russia, leaving large enterprises with unsupported platforms. Closed code, limited access to services, updates, and new components have slowed development, disrupted business processes, and increased the risk of critical failures, including production shutdowns. Enterprises with continuous production cycles are under the greatest pressure. Partial substitution of individual components is not enough—complete module replacement is necessary to eliminate dependency. But how long will a full transition to new systems take?
— Does Russia already have a domestically developed heavy or mid-tier ERP system ready for deployment at enterprises with continuous production cycles?
— How are industrial giants adapting to the situation?
— Approaches to selecting domestic ERP systems after the exit of Western vendors. What do customers expect from local platforms?
— What implementation and modernization scenarios for heavy ERP systems are viable today?
— Do domestic developers and integrators have enough skilled professionals and experience to migrate large enterprises simultaneously?

In the context of import substitution and import safety, a critical issue arises—how to ensure the effective and harmonious operation of a technology landscape based on a diverse tech stack. Before deciding whether to replace or retain a system, we must first ask: “If we replace, with what?” and “If we retain, how do we develop it?” This session will offer open dialogue between leading industrial players, integrators, and vendors. We will discuss how to ensure efficient IT investment while reducing dependence on foreign vendors and minimizing risks related to evolving domestic products.
— Is it necessary or possible to completely abandon foreign software? In which domains?
— Custom enterprise solutions as alternatives to standard platforms: real-world cases and early results
— Industry-specific standardized solutions: real examples and expected effects
— The role of integrators in aligning real client needs with vendor capabilities
— Vendor cooperation and advancing software standardization: barriers and requirements

Just as hope emerged for restoring ties with the US, the Russian IT market was shaken. Domestic vendors, having invested heavily in import-substituting products, demand clarity and protective measures against potential returns of Western IT leaders. The prevailing experience suggests that critical IT infrastructure will continue to be built on trusted Russian solutions, while remaining customer segments can choose freely. But is this status quo enough to stimulate the industry and strengthen tech sovereignty? What development scenarios are most likely, and how will they affect market strategy?
— The future of trusted software and hardware systems in regulatory frameworks
— Finding balance: how not to send mixed signals to foreign vendors while protecting domestic players
— Tech sovereignty vs. free market competition: what benefits the IT industry more?
— Tech export potential: who could be interested in Russian solutions and why?

This session is a must for businesses aiming to grow by partnering with Russia’s largest industrial corporation. It offers practical advice and clear guidance on building effective, mutually beneficial cooperation with Rostec.
We will explore trends and challenges in import substitution, showcase successful implementation in Rostec’s corporate system (classified as a critical information infrastructure object), and review the automated financial and procurement management system (AS FZD). Opportunities for Russian companies under sanctions will be discussed, as well as steps to become part of the Rostec ecosystem.
The session will also announce which AI developers will be included in the corporate Rostec standard for promotion and replication.

A systemic approach to import substitution of Building Information Modeling (BIM) technologies in Russia’s industrial and civil construction sectors. Current results and future plans by Rosatom’s Construction Industry Competence Center.
Discussion topics:
— Progress and plans for BIM import substitution in industrial and civil construction under Rosatom’s CC
— Standardizing data exchange formats and the need for a national format to ensure technological sovereignty
— Demand for a Russian comprehensive BIM solution covering the entire life cycle of capital construction projects, including decommissioning
— Regulatory and methodological support for the transition to BIM in construction
— Additional incentives for the construction industry to adopt digital models across the entire asset life cycle

Three years ago, Russian industry faced new challenges that demanded active import substitution at both technology and product levels. While significant progress has been made in strengthening domestic production, remaining issues require a comprehensive strategy to ensure long-term resilience and independence.
This session will review the lessons learned, key barriers still faced by domestic industry, and potential solutions.
— Have stable production chains been built to permanently replace foreign goods and technologies?
— Which domestic players have delivered full-scale replacements, and who is still halfway there?
— How can Russian companies compete with global leaders amid restricted access to international markets and technologies?
— Which government support measures have been most effective in driving import substitution?

Import substitution brings not only technical challenges due to unavailable solutions that require in-house development, but also internal organizational challenges during implementation. These transformations come with unpredictable risks, such as system misalignment with existing business processes, staff retraining, and new security standards.
How can companies manage these changes without disrupting operations or losing competitiveness? This is a key question for successful digital transformation under import substitution.
— What factors most often hinder integration of new solutions, and how to address them?
— How to avoid operational paralysis when switching to new systems and maintain business resilience?
— How to approach digital change systematically rather than reactively?
— How to organize team workflows in a state of constant adaptation?

Practical experience with import substitution of heavy 2D/3D CAD systems for designing complex engineering and industrial infrastructure in the energy sector.
— Collaboration between major industrial businesses and Russian software developers in the area of digital design tools (including collaboration between large enterprises)
— Outcomes of the “Finalization and implementation of a BIM software suite for industrial construction” project and future replication plans
— Current maturity and readiness of Russian 2D/3D CAD solutions for deployment beyond the nuclear industry

Technological progress is no longer optional—it’s a condition for survival. Today’s corporations have made AI and cybersecurity standard business tools. But with constant technological advancement, one question remains: are they ready to take responsibility for the future of the entire industry?
The country needs not just strong companies, but science-driven businesses that generate innovation. Facing challenges like a talent shortage, the sovereignty race, and rapid AI development, a new model of collaboration among business, science, and education is essential.
This expert session brings together leading tech companies to discuss:
— Knowledge sharing vs. protectionism: how much are companies willing to invest in collective progress?
— Where is the line between openness and competition in R&D?
— How can companies reshape the talent development system to match real needs?
— How can business support education and fundamental science, not just applied solutions?
— How to build an ecosystem where companies not only profit but drive national progress?
— Metrics of integrity: how to measure the real contribution of business to the country’s technological development?

Russia faces a unique situation in consumer electronics manufacturing. Domestic producers have ramped up production and adapted to new realities. While foreign trade restrictions spurred import substitution, this transition presents challenges, including limited component supply, talent shortages, and the need to build competitive products based on Russian technologies.
Despite the challenges, Russia’s electronics industry has shown resilience and growth. Manufacturers are expanding capacity, while government support and subsidies foster innovation. Yet the question remains: can Russian companies fully replace foreign technologies and compete globally?
— Is domestic demand sufficient to scale production? How can demand for Russian-made electronics be stimulated?
— What impact does parallel import have on the industry’s development?
— Is technological independence from foreign suppliers feasible? Can a competitive local component base be built?
— What role do Russian operating systems and software play in the electronics ecosystem?
— How do emerging technologies like AI influence the electronics industry? How are Russian manufacturers responding?
— What steps are needed to enter global markets, and what barriers must be overcome amid current geopolitical realities?
— Which global electronics trends and innovations can be adapted in Russia, and what international benchmarks should local producers follow?